Hoddles Creek vs Yarra Junction, VIC Suburb Comparison

Hoddles Creek for schools; Yarra Junction for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Hoddles CreekYarra Junction

Overall score

Hoddles Creek

43.8/100

Yarra Junction

43.0/100

Crime rate

Hoddles Creek

48.4 / 1k

Yarra Junction

65.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Hoddles Creek

4

Yarra Junction

20

Population

Hoddles Creek

676

Yarra Junction

2,875

Metric leadHoddles Creek 5Yarra Junction 52 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryHoddles CreekYarra Junction
Overall score43.8/10043.0/100
Housing (desirability)41.9/10064.2/100
Crime rate48.4 / 1k65.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools13
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves11
Public transport stops—15
Walkability0.0/10022.5/100
Nearby amenities420
Planning activity1686
Green cover7.2%3.7%
Population6762,875
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/103/10

Comparison summary

Hoddles Creek is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks, while Yarra Junction is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood.

Hoddles Creek pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Yarra Junction is the better pick for housing affordability, schools and education options, and walkability. Hoddles Creek generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while Yarra Junction leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Hoddles Creek suits retirees more clearly, whereas Yarra Junction is the stronger match for families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons