Holsworthy vs Minto Heights, NSW Suburb Comparison

Holsworthy for retirees and families; Minto Heights for investment and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

HolsworthyMinto Heights

Overall score

Holsworthy

54.1/100

Minto Heights

46.7/100

Crime rate

Holsworthy

12.5 / 1k

Minto Heights

55.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Holsworthy

13

Minto Heights

51

Population

Holsworthy

5,657

Minto Heights

384

Metric leadHolsworthy 6Minto Heights 32 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryHolsworthyMinto Heights
Overall score54.1/10046.7/100
Housing (desirability)47.6/10040.5/100
Crime rate12.5 / 1k55.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools3—
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves9—
Public transport stops5728
Walkability30.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities1351
Planning activity135
Green cover0.1%2.6%
Population5,657384
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/107/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Holsworthy is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood, and Minto Heights is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood. Holsworthy sits within day-trip reach of the capital, whereas Minto Heights is in a middle-ring position.

On the data, Holsworthy is stronger for a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and overall desirability; Minto Heights answers with housing affordability, nearby cafés and amenities, and a calmer planning outlook.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Holsworthy, while Minto Heights remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons