suburb.guide

Minto vs Minto Heights, NSW suburb comparison

Minto for families and investment; Minto Heights for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

MintoMinto Heights

Overall score

Minto

61.7/100

Minto Heights

36.1/100

Crime rate

Minto

56.6 / 1k

Minto Heights

55.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Minto

365

Minto Heights

49

Population

Minto

13,940

Minto Heights

384

Metric leadMinto 5Minto Heights 31 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMintoMinto Heights
Overall score61.7/10036.1/100
Housing (desirability)62.6/10062.6/100
Crime rate56.6 / 1k55.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools9—
Parks & reserves20—
Public transport stops18528
Walkability65.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities36549
Planning activity383
Population13,940384
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/107/10

Comparison summary

Minto is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Minto Heights is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood. Minto Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Minto keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Minto tends to lead on public transport access and walkability, while Minto Heights stands out for a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook. Minto generally means more approachable housing costs, while Minto Heights leans toward more sought-after housing.

Choose Minto if you are weighing families and investors; lean toward Minto Heights for retirees.

Related comparisons