Overall score
Howard
35.4/100
Torbanlea
22.3/100
Howard for retirees and families; Torbanlea for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Howard
35.4/100
Torbanlea
22.3/100
Crime rate
Howard
40.2 / 1k
Torbanlea
133.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Howard
0
Torbanlea
1
Population
Howard
1,394
Torbanlea
841
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Howard | Torbanlea |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 35.4/100 | 22.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 72.6/100 | 46.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 40.2 / 1k | 133.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 17.2/100 | 17.2/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 1 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 1 |
| Green cover | 2.2% | 0.0% |
| Population | 1,394 | 841 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 1/10 |
Howard reads as a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe; Torbanlea is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace.
On the data, Howard is stronger for a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and overall desirability; Torbanlea answers with housing affordability, plus nearby cafés and amenities.
Howard suits retirees, families, and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Torbanlea is the stronger match for households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.