Overall score
Humpty Doo
33.0/100
Noonamah
26.3/100
Humpty Doo for retirees and families; Noonamah for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Humpty Doo
33.0/100
Noonamah
26.3/100
Nearby amenities
Humpty Doo
3
Noonamah
3
Population
Humpty Doo
4,313
Noonamah
328
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Humpty Doo | Noonamah |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 33.0/100 | 26.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 6.6/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | — |
| Public transport stops | 15 | 9 |
| Walkability | 22.5/100 | 13.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 3 | 3 |
| Population | 4,313 | 328 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 6/10 |
Put side by side, Humpty Doo is a settled metro mid-sized suburb that balances access with everyday calm, and Noonamah is a settled metro smaller community that balances access with everyday calm.
Humpty Doo tends to lead on public transport access and walkability, while Noonamah stands out for housing affordability and overall desirability.
Humpty Doo suits retirees and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Noonamah is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.