Hunters Hill vs Lane Cove, NSW Suburb Comparison

Hunters Hill for families and schools; Lane Cove for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Hunters HillLane Cove

Overall score

Hunters Hill

63.0/100

Lane Cove

73.2/100

Crime rate

Hunters Hill

28.2 / 1k

Lane Cove

22.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Hunters Hill

169

Lane Cove

334

Population

Hunters Hill

9,014

Lane Cove

12,363

Metric leadHunters Hill 3Lane Cove 82 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryHunters HillLane Cove
Overall score63.0/10073.2/100
Housing (desirability)27.3/10053.0/100
Crime rate28.2 / 1k22.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools108
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves1715
Public transport stops120124
Walkability67.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities169334
Planning activity9432
Green cover12.7%10.7%
Population9,01412,363
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Hunters Hill reads as an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Lane Cove is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

On the data, Hunters Hill is stronger for schools and education options, plus parks and reserves; Lane Cove answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and public transport access.

Hunters Hill suits households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Lane Cove is the stronger match for retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons