Overall score
Hunters Hill
61.1/100
Lane Cove
73.9/100
Hunters Hill vs Lane Cove, NSW suburb comparison
Hunters Hill for schools; Lane Cove for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Hunters HillLane Cove
Crime rate
Hunters Hill
28.2 / 1k
Lane Cove
22.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Hunters Hill
163
Lane Cove
317
Population
Hunters Hill
9,014
Lane Cove
12,363
Metric leadHunters Hill 2Lane Cove 81 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesLane Cove
- Best for familiesLane Cove
- Best for investmentLane Cove
- Best for best valueLane Cove
- Best for best schoolsHunters Hill
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Hunters Hill | Lane Cove |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 61.1/100 | 73.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 12.0/100 | 12.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 28.2 / 1k | 22.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 10 | 8 |
| Parks & reserves | 17 | 15 |
| Public transport stops | 120 | 124 |
| Walkability | 67.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 163 | 317 |
| Planning activity | 88 | 27 |
| Population | 9,014 | 12,363 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Hunters Hill reads as an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Lane Cove is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
On the data, Hunters Hill is stronger for parks and reserves; Lane Cove answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Hunters Hill suits households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Lane Cove is the stronger match for retirees and families.