Overall score
Hyde Park
53.7/100
Myrtle Bank
51.1/100
Hyde Park vs Myrtle Bank, SA Suburb Comparison
Hyde Park for schools; Myrtle Bank for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Hyde ParkMyrtle Bank
Crime rate
Hyde Park
33.1 / 1k
Myrtle Bank
16.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Hyde Park
69
Myrtle Bank
116
Population
Hyde Park
1,660
Myrtle Bank
3,158
Metric leadHyde Park 4Myrtle Bank 52 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesMyrtle Bank
- Best for familiesMyrtle Bank
- Best for best schoolsHyde Park
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Hyde Park | Myrtle Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 53.7/100 | 51.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 56.8/100 | 42.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 33.1 / 1k | 16.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 2 |
| Weather (desirability) | 37.3/100 | 37.3/100 |
| Public transport stops | 7 | 10 |
| Walkability | 40.5/100 | 32.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 69 | 116 |
| Planning activity | 20 | 32 |
| Green cover | 0.0% | 4.7% |
| Population | 1,660 | 3,158 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Hyde Park is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby, while Myrtle Bank is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.
Hyde Park tends to lead on walkability, overall desirability, and a calmer planning outlook, while Myrtle Bank stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and public transport access.
On balance, families and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Hyde Park, while Myrtle Bank remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.