Overall score
Iluka
48.8/100
Yamba
54.8/100
Iluka vs Yamba, NSW Suburb Comparison
Iluka for families; Yamba for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
IlukaYamba
Crime rate
Iluka
39.2 / 1k
Yamba
64.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Iluka
62
Yamba
121
Population
Iluka
1,764
Yamba
6,405
Metric leadIluka 2Yamba 11across 13 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Iluka | Yamba |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 48.8/100 | 54.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 48.0/100 | 49.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 39.2 / 1k | 64.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 2 |
| Weather (desirability) | 46.3/100 | 64.0/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 17 |
| Public transport stops | 39 | 63 |
| Walkability | 74.0/100 | 78.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 62 | 121 |
| Planning activity | 33 | 76 |
| Green cover | 0.7% | 11.2% |
| Population | 1,764 | 6,405 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 4/10 |
Comparison summary
Iluka is a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace, while Yamba is a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote.
On the data, Iluka is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook; Yamba answers with schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access. Iluka generally means more approachable housing costs, while Yamba leans toward more sought-after housing.
On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Yamba, while Iluka remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.