Overall score
Inman Valley
32.7/100
Waitpinga
44.6/100
Inman Valley vs Waitpinga, SA Suburb Comparison
Waitpinga for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Inman ValleyWaitpinga
Crime rate
Inman Valley
30.5 / 1k
Waitpinga
44.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Inman Valley
1
Waitpinga
19
Population
Inman Valley
361
Waitpinga
374
Metric leadInman Valley 2Waitpinga 71 tiedacross 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Inman Valley | Waitpinga |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 32.7/100 | 44.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 48.9/100 | 55.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 30.5 / 1k | 44.2 / 1k |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 1 |
| Public transport stops | — | 2 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 3.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1 | 19 |
| Planning activity | 19 | 47 |
| Green cover | 13.2% | 18.5% |
| Population | 361 | 374 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 7/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Inman Valley is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds, and Waitpinga is a coastal smaller community with an easy, sea-led rhythm. Where Waitpinga is shaped by the coast, Inman Valley offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.
Inman Valley pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, overall desirability, and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Waitpinga is the better pick for housing affordability, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities. On housing, Inman Valley sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Waitpinga.
Choose Inman Valley if you are weighing families; lean toward Waitpinga for people chasing a beach lifestyle, investors, and value-focused buyers.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.