Jewells vs Tingira Heights, NSW Suburb Comparison

Jewells for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

JewellsTingira Heights

Overall score

Jewells

48.0/100

Tingira Heights

32.2/100

Crime rate

Jewells

88.1 / 1k

Tingira Heights

66.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Jewells

43

Tingira Heights

15

Population

Jewells

2,452

Tingira Heights

2,043

Metric leadJewells 9Tingira Heights 22 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryJewellsTingira Heights
Overall score48.0/10032.2/100
Housing (desirability)63.5/10021.6/100
Crime rate88.1 / 1k66.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools43
Weather (desirability)60.5/10060.5/100
Parks & reserves12
Public transport stops3130
Walkability80.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities4315
Planning activity88
Green cover6.6%4.1%
Population2,4522,043
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/105/10

Comparison summary

Jewells is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm, while Tingira Heights is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood. Tingira Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Jewells keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Jewells is stronger for housing affordability, schools and education options, and public transport access; Tingira Heights answers with a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and a calmer planning outlook.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Jewells, while Tingira Heights remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons