Overall score
Jindalee
69.6/100
Middle Park
58.5/100
Jindalee vs Middle Park, QLD Suburb Comparison
Jindalee for retirees and families; Middle Park for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
JindaleeMiddle Park
Crime rate
Jindalee
49.2 / 1k
Middle Park
49.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Jindalee
267
Middle Park
69
Population
Jindalee
5,320
Middle Park
3,845
Metric leadJindalee 8Middle Park 22 tiedacross 12 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesJindalee
- Best for familiesJindalee
- Best for best valueJindalee
- Best for best schoolsMiddle Park
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Jindalee | Middle Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 69.6/100 | 58.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 57.0/100 | 57.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 49.2 / 1k | 49.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 3 |
| Weather (desirability) | 42.8/100 | 42.8/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 7 | 5 |
| Public transport stops | 15 | 12 |
| Walkability | 92.5/100 | 70.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 267 | 69 |
| Green cover | 9.1% | 4.2% |
| Population | 5,320 | 3,845 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Jindalee reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Middle Park is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.
On the data, Jindalee is stronger for schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access; Middle Park answers with a quieter safety profile.
On balance, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Jindalee, while Middle Park remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.