Overall score
Kalorama
41.0/100
Mount Dandenong
44.8/100
Kalorama for value; Mount Dandenong for retirees and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Kalorama
41.0/100
Mount Dandenong
44.8/100
Crime rate
Kalorama
27.1 / 1k
Mount Dandenong
48.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Kalorama
116
Mount Dandenong
151
Population
Kalorama
1,277
Mount Dandenong
1,271
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Kalorama | Mount Dandenong |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 41.0/100 | 44.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 39.0/100 | 27.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 27.1 / 1k | 48.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 21 | 35 |
| Walkability | 32.0/100 | 36.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 116 | 151 |
| Planning activity | 23 | 22 |
| Population | 1,277 | 1,271 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 10/10 |
Kalorama reads as a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks; Mount Dandenong is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks.
Kalorama tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Mount Dandenong stands out for public transport access and walkability.
Kalorama suits value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Mount Dandenong is the stronger match for retirees and households prioritising schools.