Kalorama vs Mount Dandenong, VIC suburb comparison

Kalorama for value; Mount Dandenong for retirees and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

KaloramaMount Dandenong

Overall score

Kalorama

41.0/100

Mount Dandenong

44.8/100

Crime rate

Kalorama

27.1 / 1k

Mount Dandenong

48.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Kalorama

116

Mount Dandenong

151

Population

Kalorama

1,277

Mount Dandenong

1,271

Metric leadKalorama 4Mount Dandenong 6across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKaloramaMount Dandenong
Overall score41.0/10044.8/100
Housing (desirability)39.0/10027.4/100
Crime rate27.1 / 1k48.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools2
Parks & reserves21
Public transport stops2135
Walkability32.0/10036.0/100
Nearby amenities116151
Planning activity2322
Population1,2771,271
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/1010/10

Comparison summary

Kalorama reads as a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks; Mount Dandenong is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks.

Kalorama tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Mount Dandenong stands out for public transport access and walkability.

Kalorama suits value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Mount Dandenong is the stronger match for retirees and households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons