Overall score
Kangaroo Flat
51.7/100
Spring Gully
53.7/100
Kangaroo Flat for retirees and investment; Spring Gully for families and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Kangaroo Flat
51.7/100
Spring Gully
53.7/100
Crime rate
Kangaroo Flat
101.6 / 1k
Spring Gully
41.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Kangaroo Flat
176
Spring Gully
135
Population
Kangaroo Flat
11,328
Spring Gully
3,092
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Kangaroo Flat | Spring Gully |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 51.7/100 | 53.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 77.5/100 | 71.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 101.6 / 1k | 41.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 53.4/100 | 53.4/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 10 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 70 | 16 |
| Walkability | 92.0/100 | 26.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 176 | 135 |
| Planning activity | 103 | 30 |
| Green cover | 40.2% | 65.2% |
| Population | 11,328 | 3,092 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 7/10 |
Put side by side, Kangaroo Flat is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience, and Spring Gully is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks. Spring Gully sits among greener hillside streets, while Kangaroo Flat keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Kangaroo Flat tends to lead on housing affordability, schools and education options, and parks and reserves, while Spring Gully stands out for a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage. On housing, Kangaroo Flat sits in a affordable band, compared with a gently premium feel in Spring Gully.
Families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools may find Kangaroo Flat the better fit, while retirees are more likely to prefer Spring Gully.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.