Overall score
Karana Downs
52.6/100
Kholo
57.8/100
Karana Downs vs Kholo, QLD Suburb Comparison
Karana Downs for retirees and families; Kholo for value and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Karana DownsKholo
Crime rate
Karana Downs
56.2 / 1k
Kholo
55.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Karana Downs
43
Kholo
3
Population
Karana Downs
3,800
Kholo
374
Metric leadKarana Downs 5Kholo 41 tiedacross 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesKarana Downs
- Best for familiesKarana Downs
- Best for best valueKholo
- Best for best schoolsKholo
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Karana Downs | Kholo |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 52.6/100 | 57.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 58.0/100 | 60.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 56.2 / 1k | 55.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Weather (desirability) | 42.8/100 | 42.8/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 6 | 2 |
| Walkability | 29.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 43 | 3 |
| Green cover | 8.6% | 2.6% |
| Population | 3,800 | 374 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Karana Downs reads as a metro mid-sized suburb with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm; Kholo is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds. Karana Downs sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Kholo is within day-trip reach of the capital.
Karana Downs pulls ahead on parks and reserves, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Kholo is the better pick for housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage.
Households prioritising schools may find Karana Downs the better fit, while retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Kholo.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.