Karloo vs Wandina, WA Suburb Comparison

Karloo for families; Wandina for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

KarlooWandina

Overall score

Karloo

30.0/100

Wandina

39.4/100

Crime rate

Karloo

132.8 / 1k

Wandina

132.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Karloo

8

Wandina

36

Population

Karloo

495

Wandina

4,375

Metric leadKarloo 1Wandina 92 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKarlooWandina
Overall score30.0/10039.4/100
Housing (desirability)24.9/10035.9/100
Crime rate132.8 / 1k132.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools21
Weather (desirability)2.8/1002.8/100
Parks & reserves110
Public transport stops521
Walkability7.5/10055.0/100
Nearby amenities836
Green cover0.3%4.9%
Population4954,375
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/107/10

Comparison summary

Karloo reads as a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace; Wandina is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace.

On the data, Karloo is stronger for schools and education options; Wandina answers with housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access. Karloo generally means more approachable housing costs, while Wandina leans toward housing toward the upper end of the market.

On balance, retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Wandina, while Karloo remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons