Keilor Downs vs Keilor Lodge, VIC Suburb Comparison

Keilor Downs for retirees and investment; Keilor Lodge for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Keilor DownsKeilor Lodge

Overall score

Keilor Downs

45.9/100

Keilor Lodge

46.3/100

Crime rate

Keilor Downs

57.1 / 1k

Keilor Lodge

21.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Keilor Downs

259

Keilor Lodge

36

Population

Keilor Downs

9,857

Keilor Lodge

1,668

Metric leadKeilor Downs 7Keilor Lodge 51 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKeilor DownsKeilor Lodge
Overall score45.9/10046.3/100
Housing (desirability)55.2/10052.8/100
Crime rate57.1 / 1k21.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools104
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves175
Public transport stops457
Walkability61.0/10010.5/100
Nearby amenities25936
Planning activity103
Green cover5.7%6.7%
Population9,8571,668
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/108/10

Comparison summary

Keilor Downs reads as an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Keilor Lodge is a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand.

Keilor Downs tends to lead on housing affordability, schools and education options, and parks and reserves, while Keilor Lodge stands out for a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Keilor Downs generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while Keilor Lodge leans toward more sought-after housing.

Keilor Downs suits families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Keilor Lodge is the stronger match for retirees.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons