Kelso vs Raglan, NSW Suburb Comparison

Kelso for retirees and investment; Raglan for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

KelsoRaglan

Overall score

Kelso

41.0/100

Raglan

34.5/100

Crime rate

Kelso

94.6 / 1k

Raglan

94.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Kelso

173

Raglan

57

Population

Kelso

10,039

Raglan

1,272

Metric leadKelso 9Raglan 13 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKelsoRaglan
Overall score41.0/10034.5/100
Housing (desirability)59.0/10052.6/100
Crime rate94.6 / 1k94.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools31
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves102
Public transport stops28347
Walkability71.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities17357
Planning activity4411
Green cover2.9%0.9%
Population10,0391,272
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/103/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Kelso is a regional established suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace, and Raglan is a regional smaller community that feels self-contained without feeling remote.

On the data, Kelso is stronger for schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access; Raglan answers with a calmer planning outlook.

On balance, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Kelso, while Raglan remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons

Kelso vs Raglan, NSW Suburb Comparison | Suburb Guide