Overall score
Kelso
41.0/100
Raglan
34.5/100
Kelso for retirees and investment; Raglan for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Kelso
41.0/100
Raglan
34.5/100
Crime rate
Kelso
94.6 / 1k
Raglan
94.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Kelso
173
Raglan
57
Population
Kelso
10,039
Raglan
1,272
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Kelso | Raglan |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 41.0/100 | 34.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 59.0/100 | 52.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 94.6 / 1k | 94.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 10 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 283 | 47 |
| Walkability | 71.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 173 | 57 |
| Planning activity | 44 | 11 |
| Green cover | 2.9% | 0.9% |
| Population | 10,039 | 1,272 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 3/10 |
Put side by side, Kelso is a regional established suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace, and Raglan is a regional smaller community that feels self-contained without feeling remote.
On the data, Kelso is stronger for schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access; Raglan answers with a calmer planning outlook.
On balance, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Kelso, while Raglan remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.