Kiels Mountain vs Rosemount, QLD Suburb Comparison

Kiels Mountain for families; Rosemount for investment and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Kiels MountainRosemount

Overall score

Kiels Mountain

42.4/100

Rosemount

42.2/100

Crime rate

Kiels Mountain

29.6 / 1k

Rosemount

50.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Kiels Mountain

2

Rosemount

1

Population

Kiels Mountain

714

Rosemount

1,851

Metric leadKiels Mountain 4Rosemount 32 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKiels MountainRosemount
Overall score42.4/10042.2/100
Housing (desirability)50.1/10065.5/100
Crime rate29.6 / 1k50.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools1—
Weather (desirability)31.2/10031.2/100
Walkability0.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities21
Green cover0.0%3.7%
Population7141,851
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/107/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Kiels Mountain is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood, and Rosemount is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood.

On the data, Kiels Mountain is stronger for a quieter safety profile, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability; Rosemount answers with a larger local community. Kiels Mountain generally means more sought-after housing, while Rosemount leans toward housing toward the upper end of the market.

On balance, retirees, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Kiels Mountain, while Rosemount remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons