Overall score
Kiels Mountain
43.0/100
Rosemount
31.4/100
Kiels Mountain vs Rosemount, QLD suburb comparison
Kiels Mountain for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Kiels MountainRosemount
Crime rate
Kiels Mountain
17.7 / 1k
Rosemount
30.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Kiels Mountain
1
Rosemount
1
Population
Kiels Mountain
714
Rosemount
1,851
Metric leadKiels Mountain 3Rosemount 13 tiedacross 7 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesKiels Mountain
- Best for familiesKiels Mountain
- Best for best valueKiels Mountain
- Best for best schoolsKiels Mountain
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Kiels Mountain | Rosemount |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 43.0/100 | 31.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 17.7 / 1k | 30.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1 | 1 |
| Population | 714 | 1,851 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 7/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Kiels Mountain is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood, and Rosemount is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood.
On the data, Kiels Mountain is stronger for a quieter safety profile and overall desirability; Rosemount answers with a larger local community. Kiels Mountain generally means more sought-after housing, while Rosemount leans toward more mid-market housing value.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Kiels Mountain, while Rosemount remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.