Overall score
Kings Park
51.9/100
St Albans
69.8/100
Kings Park vs St Albans, VIC suburb comparison
Kings Park for retirees and value; St Albans for investment and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Kings ParkSt Albans
Crime rate
Kings Park
48.1 / 1k
St Albans
103.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Kings Park
89
St Albans
610
Population
Kings Park
8,203
St Albans
38,042
Metric leadKings Park 3St Albans 71 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesKings Park
- Best for investmentSt Albans
- Best for best valueKings Park
- Best for best schoolsSt Albans
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Kings Park | St Albans |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 51.9/100 | 69.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 81.2/100 | 55.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 48.1 / 1k | 103.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 10 | 13 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | 34 |
| Public transport stops | 29 | 168 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 89 | 610 |
| Planning activity | 5 | 80 |
| Population | 8,203 | 38,042 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 1/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Kings Park is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and St Albans is a lively metro larger suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Kings Park tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while St Albans stands out for schools and education options and parks and reserves.
Choose Kings Park if you are weighing retirees and value-focused buyers; lean toward St Albans for investors and households prioritising schools.