Overall score
Deer Park
68.5/100
Kings Park
51.9/100
Deer Park for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Deer Park
68.5/100
Kings Park
51.9/100
Crime rate
Deer Park
75.6 / 1k
Kings Park
48.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Deer Park
225
Kings Park
89
Population
Deer Park
18,145
Kings Park
8,203
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Deer Park | Kings Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 68.5/100 | 51.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 75.7/100 | 81.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 75.6 / 1k | 48.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 10 |
| Parks & reserves | 7 | 8 |
| Public transport stops | 76 | 29 |
| Walkability | 75.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 225 | 89 |
| Planning activity | 31 | 5 |
| Population | 18,145 | 8,203 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 1/10 |
Deer Park is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Kings Park is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Deer Park tends to lead on public transport access and walkability, while Kings Park stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
On balance, families and investors are more likely to prefer Deer Park, while Kings Park remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.