Overall score
Cairnlea
60.8/100
Kings Park
51.9/100
Cairnlea for retirees and schools; Kings Park for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Cairnlea
60.8/100
Kings Park
51.9/100
Crime rate
Cairnlea
47.3 / 1k
Kings Park
48.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Cairnlea
133
Kings Park
89
Population
Cairnlea
10,038
Kings Park
8,203
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Cairnlea | Kings Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 60.8/100 | 51.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 56.3/100 | 81.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 47.3 / 1k | 48.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 10 |
| Parks & reserves | 12 | 8 |
| Public transport stops | 27 | 29 |
| Walkability | 92.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 133 | 89 |
| Planning activity | 1 | 5 |
| Population | 10,038 | 8,203 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 1/10 |
Put side by side, Cairnlea is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Kings Park is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Cairnlea pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves, whereas Kings Park is the better pick for housing affordability and schools and education options. Cairnlea generally means more mid-market housing value, while Kings Park leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Choose Cairnlea if you are weighing retirees and households prioritising schools; lean toward Kings Park for investors and value-focused buyers.