Overall score
Keilor Downs
63.7/100
Kings Park
51.9/100
Keilor Downs for retirees and families; Kings Park for value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Keilor Downs
63.7/100
Kings Park
51.9/100
Crime rate
Keilor Downs
59.8 / 1k
Kings Park
48.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Keilor Downs
255
Kings Park
89
Population
Keilor Downs
9,857
Kings Park
8,203
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Keilor Downs | Kings Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 63.7/100 | 51.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 60.4/100 | 81.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 59.8 / 1k | 48.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 10 | 10 |
| Parks & reserves | 17 | 8 |
| Public transport stops | 45 | 29 |
| Walkability | 61.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 255 | 89 |
| Planning activity | 10 | 5 |
| Population | 9,857 | 8,203 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 1/10 |
Keilor Downs reads as an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Kings Park is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
On the data, Keilor Downs is stronger for parks and reserves and public transport access; Kings Park answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Keilor Downs generally means more mid-market housing value, while Kings Park leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Retirees and families may find Keilor Downs the better fit, while value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Kings Park.