Keilor Downs vs Kings Park, VIC suburb comparison

Keilor Downs for retirees and families; Kings Park for value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Keilor DownsKings Park

Overall score

Keilor Downs

63.7/100

Kings Park

51.9/100

Crime rate

Keilor Downs

59.8 / 1k

Kings Park

48.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Keilor Downs

255

Kings Park

89

Population

Keilor Downs

9,857

Kings Park

8,203

Metric leadKeilor Downs 7Kings Park 31 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKeilor DownsKings Park
Overall score63.7/10051.9/100
Housing (desirability)60.4/10081.2/100
Crime rate59.8 / 1k48.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools1010
Parks & reserves178
Public transport stops4529
Walkability61.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities25589
Planning activity105
Population9,8578,203
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/101/10

Comparison summary

Keilor Downs reads as an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Kings Park is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

On the data, Keilor Downs is stronger for parks and reserves and public transport access; Kings Park answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Keilor Downs generally means more mid-market housing value, while Kings Park leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Retirees and families may find Keilor Downs the better fit, while value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Kings Park.

Related comparisons