Kings Park vs Taylors Lakes, VIC suburb comparison

Kings Park for families and value; Taylors Lakes for retirees and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Kings ParkTaylors Lakes

Overall score

Kings Park

51.9/100

Taylors Lakes

67.0/100

Crime rate

Kings Park

48.1 / 1k

Taylors Lakes

98.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Kings Park

89

Taylors Lakes

1,518

Population

Kings Park

8,203

Taylors Lakes

15,174

Metric leadKings Park 4Taylors Lakes 7across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKings ParkTaylors Lakes
Overall score51.9/10067.0/100
Housing (desirability)81.2/10058.5/100
Crime rate48.1 / 1k98.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools105
Parks & reserves826
Public transport stops29101
Walkability30.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities891,518
Planning activity515
Population8,20315,174
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/108/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Kings Park is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Taylors Lakes is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Kings Park pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Taylors Lakes is the better pick for parks and reserves and public transport access. Kings Park generally means more approachable housing costs, while Taylors Lakes leans toward more mid-market housing value.

Families and value-focused buyers may find Kings Park the better fit, while retirees and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Taylors Lakes.

Related comparisons