Overall score
Kings Park
51.9/100
Taylors Lakes
67.0/100
Kings Park for families and value; Taylors Lakes for retirees and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Kings Park
51.9/100
Taylors Lakes
67.0/100
Crime rate
Kings Park
48.1 / 1k
Taylors Lakes
98.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Kings Park
89
Taylors Lakes
1,518
Population
Kings Park
8,203
Taylors Lakes
15,174
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Kings Park | Taylors Lakes |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 51.9/100 | 67.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 81.2/100 | 58.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 48.1 / 1k | 98.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 10 | 5 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | 26 |
| Public transport stops | 29 | 101 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 89 | 1,518 |
| Planning activity | 5 | 15 |
| Population | 8,203 | 15,174 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 8/10 |
Put side by side, Kings Park is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Taylors Lakes is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Kings Park pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Taylors Lakes is the better pick for parks and reserves and public transport access. Kings Park generally means more approachable housing costs, while Taylors Lakes leans toward more mid-market housing value.
Families and value-focused buyers may find Kings Park the better fit, while retirees and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Taylors Lakes.