Overall score
Keilor Downs
45.9/100
Taylors Lakes
55.3/100
Keilor Downs for families; Taylors Lakes for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Keilor Downs
45.9/100
Taylors Lakes
55.3/100
Crime rate
Keilor Downs
57.1 / 1k
Taylors Lakes
97.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Keilor Downs
259
Taylors Lakes
1,529
Population
Keilor Downs
9,857
Taylors Lakes
15,174
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Keilor Downs | Taylors Lakes |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 45.9/100 | 55.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 55.2/100 | 48.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 57.1 / 1k | 97.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 10 | 5 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 17 | 26 |
| Public transport stops | 45 | 101 |
| Walkability | 61.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 259 | 1,529 |
| Planning activity | 10 | 15 |
| Green cover | 5.7% | 10.2% |
| Population | 9,857 | 15,174 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 8/10 |
Keilor Downs reads as an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Taylors Lakes is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Keilor Downs pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options, whereas Taylors Lakes is the better pick for parks and reserves, public transport access, and walkability.
On balance, families, investors, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Keilor Downs, while Taylors Lakes remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.