Overall score
Kings Park
36.6/100
St Albans
39.3/100
Kings Park for families and investment; St Albans for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Kings Park
36.6/100
St Albans
39.3/100
Crime rate
Kings Park
48.1 / 1k
St Albans
103.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Kings Park
92
St Albans
617
Population
Kings Park
8,203
St Albans
38,042
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Kings Park | St Albans |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 36.6/100 | 39.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 47.0/100 | 31.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 48.1 / 1k | 103.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 10 | 13 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | 34 |
| Public transport stops | 29 | 168 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 92 | 617 |
| Planning activity | 5 | 80 |
| Green cover | 9.8% | 4.9% |
| Population | 8,203 | 38,042 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 1/10 |
Put side by side, Kings Park is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and St Albans is a lively metro larger suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Kings Park tends to lead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook, while St Albans stands out for schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access.
Choose Kings Park if you are weighing retirees and value-focused buyers; lean toward St Albans for investors and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.