Kings Park vs St Albans, VIC Suburb Comparison

Kings Park for families and investment; St Albans for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Kings ParkSt Albans

Overall score

Kings Park

36.6/100

St Albans

39.3/100

Crime rate

Kings Park

48.1 / 1k

St Albans

103.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Kings Park

92

St Albans

617

Population

Kings Park

8,203

St Albans

38,042

Metric leadKings Park 4St Albans 72 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKings ParkSt Albans
Overall score36.6/10039.3/100
Housing (desirability)47.0/10031.9/100
Crime rate48.1 / 1k103.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools1013
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves834
Public transport stops29168
Walkability30.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities92617
Planning activity580
Green cover9.8%4.9%
Population8,20338,042
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/101/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Kings Park is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and St Albans is a lively metro larger suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Kings Park tends to lead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook, while St Albans stands out for schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access.

Choose Kings Park if you are weighing retirees and value-focused buyers; lean toward St Albans for investors and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons

Kings Park vs St Albans, VIC Suburb… | Suburb Guide