Kingsley vs Warwick, WA suburb comparison

Kingsley for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

KingsleyWarwick

Overall score

Kingsley

64.8/100

Warwick

68.8/100

Crime rate

Kingsley

760.4 / 1k

Warwick

2611.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Kingsley

105

Warwick

140

Population

Kingsley

13,204

Warwick

3,858

Metric leadKingsley 6Warwick 31 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKingsleyWarwick
Overall score64.8/10068.8/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10076.0/100
Crime rate760.4 / 1k2611.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools96
Parks & reserves134
Public transport stops8352
Walkability74.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities105140
Population13,2043,858
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/108/10

Comparison summary

Kingsley reads as an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Warwick is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Kingsley pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and schools and education options, whereas Warwick is the better pick for walkability and nearby cafés and amenities.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Kingsley, while Warwick remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons