Padbury vs Warwick, WA suburb comparison

Warwick for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

PadburyWarwick

Overall score

Padbury

61.2/100

Warwick

68.8/100

Crime rate

Padbury

1079.5 / 1k

Warwick

2611.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Padbury

96

Warwick

140

Population

Padbury

8,626

Warwick

3,858

Metric leadPadbury 4Warwick 51 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryPadburyWarwick
Overall score61.2/10068.8/100
Housing (desirability)51.4/10076.0/100
Crime rate1079.5 / 1k2611.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools136
Parks & reserves134
Public transport stops5052
Walkability86.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities96140
Population8,6263,858
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/108/10

Comparison summary

Padbury reads as an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Warwick is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Padbury tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and schools and education options, while Warwick stands out for housing affordability and public transport access.

On balance, investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Warwick, while Padbury remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons