Kingston vs Red Hill, ACT Suburb Comparison

Kingston for investment; Red Hill for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

KingstonRed Hill

Overall score

Kingston

59.7/100

Red Hill

50.8/100

Crime rate

Kingston

18.0 / 1k

Red Hill

12.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Kingston

678

Red Hill

125

Population

Kingston

6,579

Red Hill

3,146

Metric leadKingston 8Red Hill 12 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKingstonRed Hill
Overall score59.7/10050.8/100
Housing (desirability)52.3/10024.6/100
Crime rate18.0 / 1k12.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools54
Weather (desirability)51.2/10051.2/100
Parks & reserves3
Walkability100.0/10055.5/100
Nearby amenities678125
Planning activity18
Green cover5.8%1.9%
Population6,5793,146
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Kingston is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Red Hill is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Kingston pulls ahead on schools and education options, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Red Hill is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

Kingston suits families and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Red Hill is the stronger match for investors.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons

Kingston vs Red Hill, ACT Suburb Comparison | Suburb Guide