Overall score
Kingston
57.7/100
Leslie Vale
30.0/100
Kingston for investment and value; Leslie Vale for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Kingston
57.7/100
Leslie Vale
30.0/100
Crime rate
Kingston
107.0 / 1k
Leslie Vale
3353.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Kingston
90
Leslie Vale
2
Population
Kingston
12,288
Leslie Vale
392
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Kingston | Leslie Vale |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 57.7/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 45.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 107.0 / 1k | 3353.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Parks & reserves | 20 | — |
| Public transport stops | 64 | 2 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 3.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 90 | 2 |
| Population | 12,288 | 392 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 8/10 |
Kingston is a hillside established suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace, while Leslie Vale is a settled metro smaller community that balances access with everyday calm. Kingston sits among greener hillside streets, while Leslie Vale keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Kingston pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Leslie Vale is the better pick for stronger socioeconomic advantage. Kingston generally means more sought-after housing, while Leslie Vale leans toward more mid-market housing value.
Kingston suits families and investors more clearly, whereas Leslie Vale is the stronger match for retirees.