Kingston vs Taroona, TAS suburb comparison

Kingston for investment and value; Taroona for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

KingstonTaroona

Overall score

Kingston

57.7/100

Taroona

54.6/100

Crime rate

Kingston

107.0 / 1k

Taroona

454.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Kingston

90

Taroona

94

Population

Kingston

12,288

Taroona

3,121

Metric leadKingston 6Taroona 4across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKingstonTaroona
Overall score57.7/10054.6/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10050.1/100
Crime rate107.0 / 1k454.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools12
Parks & reserves206
Public transport stops6423
Walkability30.0/10034.0/100
Nearby amenities9094
Population12,2883,121
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Kingston is a hillside established suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace, and Taroona is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood.

On the data, Kingston is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Taroona answers with walkability and nearby cafés and amenities.

Investors and value-focused buyers may find Kingston the better fit, while retirees are more likely to prefer Taroona.

Related comparisons