Kirwan vs Mount Louisa, QLD suburb comparison

Kirwan for families and value; Mount Louisa for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

KirwanMount Louisa

Overall score

Kirwan

62.2/100

Mount Louisa

44.3/100

Crime rate

Kirwan

65.1 / 1k

Mount Louisa

114.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Kirwan

78

Mount Louisa

15

Population

Kirwan

20,780

Mount Louisa

9,227

Metric leadKirwan 7Mount Louisa 2across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKirwanMount Louisa
Overall score62.2/10044.3/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10079.7/100
Crime rate65.1 / 1k114.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools52
Parks & reserves218
Walkability49.0/10025.0/100
Nearby amenities7815
Population20,7809,227
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/106/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Kirwan is a regional established suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace, and Mount Louisa is a hills established suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood. Mount Louisa sits among greener hillside streets, while Kirwan keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Kirwan pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and schools and education options, whereas Mount Louisa is the better pick for housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage. On housing, Kirwan sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Mount Louisa.

Choose Kirwan if you are weighing families and value-focused buyers; lean toward Mount Louisa for investors.

Related comparisons