Overall score
Laidley
34.3/100
Summerholm
39.7/100
Laidley for retirees and families; Summerholm for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Laidley
34.3/100
Summerholm
39.7/100
Crime rate
Laidley
64.5 / 1k
Summerholm
63.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Laidley
12
Summerholm
0
Population
Laidley
3,809
Summerholm
646
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Laidley | Summerholm |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 34.3/100 | 39.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 65.1/100 | 46.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 64.5 / 1k | 63.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | — |
| Weather (desirability) | 27.4/100 | 27.4/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | — |
| Public transport stops | 8 | — |
| Walkability | 12.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 12 | 0 |
| Green cover | 1.2% | 0.0% |
| Population | 3,809 | 646 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 4/10 |
Put side by side, Laidley is a slower-paced mid-sized suburb with open surrounds, and Summerholm is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace.
Laidley pulls ahead on housing affordability, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Summerholm is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, overall desirability, and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Laidley generally means more approachable housing costs, while Summerholm leans toward more mid-market housing value.
Laidley suits investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Summerholm is the stronger match for retirees and families.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.