Overall score
Laidley
42.2/100
Summerholm
47.3/100
Laidley for investment and value; Summerholm for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Laidley
42.2/100
Summerholm
47.3/100
Crime rate
Laidley
41.5 / 1k
Summerholm
41.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Laidley
11
Summerholm
0
Population
Laidley
3,809
Summerholm
646
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Laidley | Summerholm |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 42.2/100 | 47.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 68.9/100 | 55.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 41.5 / 1k | 41.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | — |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | — |
| Public transport stops | 8 | — |
| Walkability | 12.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 11 | 0 |
| Population | 3,809 | 646 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 4/10 |
Put side by side, Laidley is a slower-paced mid-sized suburb with open surrounds, and Summerholm is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace.
Laidley pulls ahead on housing affordability and walkability, whereas Summerholm is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and overall desirability. Laidley generally means more approachable housing costs, while Summerholm leans toward more mid-market housing value.
Laidley suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Summerholm is the stronger match for retirees and families.