Laidley vs Summerholm, QLD suburb comparison

Laidley for investment and value; Summerholm for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

LaidleySummerholm

Overall score

Laidley

42.2/100

Summerholm

47.3/100

Crime rate

Laidley

41.5 / 1k

Summerholm

41.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Laidley

11

Summerholm

0

Population

Laidley

3,809

Summerholm

646

Metric leadLaidley 4Summerholm 3across 7 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryLaidleySummerholm
Overall score42.2/10047.3/100
Housing (desirability)68.9/10055.0/100
Crime rate41.5 / 1k41.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools2
Parks & reserves3
Public transport stops8
Walkability12.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities110
Population3,809646
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/104/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Laidley is a slower-paced mid-sized suburb with open surrounds, and Summerholm is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace.

Laidley pulls ahead on housing affordability and walkability, whereas Summerholm is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and overall desirability. Laidley generally means more approachable housing costs, while Summerholm leans toward more mid-market housing value.

Laidley suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Summerholm is the stronger match for retirees and families.

Related comparisons