Overall score
Lake Coogee
40.4/100
Yangebup
43.4/100
Lake Coogee vs Yangebup, WA Suburb Comparison
Lake Coogee for families; Yangebup for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Lake CoogeeYangebup
Crime rate
Lake Coogee
53.7 / 1k
Yangebup
53.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Lake Coogee
69
Yangebup
58
Population
Lake Coogee
4,768
Yangebup
7,631
Metric leadLake Coogee 4Yangebup 62 tiedacross 12 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesYangebup
- Best for familiesLake Coogee
- Best for investmentYangebup
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Lake Coogee | Yangebup |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 40.4/100 | 43.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 63.1/100 | 63.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 53.7 / 1k | 53.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 5 |
| Weather (desirability) | 23.4/100 | 23.4/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 7 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 25 | 44 |
| Walkability | 32.0/100 | 61.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 69 | 58 |
| Green cover | 5.1% | 3.7% |
| Population | 4,768 | 7,631 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 6/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Lake Coogee is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Yangebup is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Lake Coogee tends to lead on parks and reserves, nearby cafés and amenities, and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Yangebup stands out for schools and education options, public transport access, and walkability.
On balance, families are more likely to prefer Yangebup, while Lake Coogee remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.