Overall score
Lakelands
33.2/100
Mount Hutton
49.0/100
Lakelands for retirees and families; Mount Hutton for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Lakelands
33.2/100
Mount Hutton
49.0/100
Crime rate
Lakelands
37.1 / 1k
Mount Hutton
66.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Lakelands
205
Mount Hutton
38
Population
Lakelands
1,445
Mount Hutton
3,712
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Lakelands | Mount Hutton |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 33.2/100 | 49.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 22.3/100 | 59.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 37.1 / 1k | 66.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 16 | 77 |
| Walkability | 26.0/100 | 59.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 205 | 38 |
| Planning activity | 2 | 16 |
| Population | 1,445 | 3,712 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 3/10 |
Lakelands reads as a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by; Mount Hutton is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood. Mount Hutton sits among greener hillside streets, while Lakelands keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Lakelands pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Mount Hutton is the better pick for housing affordability and public transport access. Lakelands generally means more sought-after housing, while Mount Hutton leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Retirees and families may find Lakelands the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Mount Hutton.