Lakesland vs Thirlmere, NSW Suburb Comparison

Lakesland for value and schools; Thirlmere for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

LakeslandThirlmere

Overall score

Lakesland

53.1/100

Thirlmere

51.8/100

Crime rate

Lakesland

21.8 / 1k

Thirlmere

21.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Lakesland

0

Thirlmere

41

Population

Lakesland

499

Thirlmere

4,986

Metric leadLakesland 3Thirlmere 71 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryLakeslandThirlmere
Overall score53.1/10051.8/100
Housing (desirability)48.1/10057.6/100
Crime rate21.8 / 1k21.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools—1
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves—3
Public transport stops44307
Walkability30.0/10049.0/100
Nearby amenities041
Planning activity5115
Green cover2.8%7.0%
Population4994,986
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/105/10

Comparison summary

Lakesland is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds, while Thirlmere is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience.

Lakesland pulls ahead on housing affordability, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Thirlmere is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and walkability.

Choose Lakesland if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Thirlmere for value-focused buyers and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons