Overall score
Lakesland
45.3/100
Thirlmere
58.1/100
Lakesland for retirees and families; Thirlmere for value and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Lakesland
45.3/100
Thirlmere
58.1/100
Crime rate
Lakesland
21.8 / 1k
Thirlmere
21.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Lakesland
0
Thirlmere
38
Population
Lakesland
499
Thirlmere
4,986
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Lakesland | Thirlmere |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 45.3/100 | 58.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 79.2/100 | 75.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 21.8 / 1k | 21.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 44 | 307 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 49.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 38 |
| Planning activity | 3 | 99 |
| Population | 499 | 4,986 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 5/10 |
Lakesland is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds, while Thirlmere is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience.
Lakesland pulls ahead on housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Thirlmere is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and public transport access.
Choose Lakesland if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Thirlmere for value-focused buyers and households prioritising schools.