Lamington vs Mullingar, WA suburb comparison

Lamington for retirees and families; Mullingar for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

LamingtonMullingar

Overall score

Lamington

34.6/100

Mullingar

29.9/100

Crime rate

Lamington

2757.0 / 1k

Mullingar

19935.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Lamington

4

Mullingar

0

Population

Lamington

2,036

Mullingar

318

Metric leadLamington 6Mullingar 1across 7 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryLamingtonMullingar
Overall score34.6/10029.9/100
Housing (desirability)44.2/10076.6/100
Crime rate2757.0 / 1k19935.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools4
Public transport stops7
Walkability10.5/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities40
Population2,036318
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/106/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Lamington is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace, and Mullingar is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe. Lamington sits further into the wider countryside, whereas Mullingar is more remote from the capital.

Lamington tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and walkability, while Mullingar stands out for housing affordability.

Choose Lamington if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Mullingar for investors and value-focused buyers.

Related comparisons