Mullingar vs Piccadilly, WA suburb comparison

Mullingar for investment and value; Piccadilly for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

MullingarPiccadilly

Overall score

Mullingar

29.9/100

Piccadilly

35.6/100

Crime rate

Mullingar

19935.4 / 1k

Piccadilly

2435.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Mullingar

0

Piccadilly

4

Population

Mullingar

318

Piccadilly

2,305

Metric leadMullingar 2Piccadilly 5across 7 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMullingarPiccadilly
Overall score29.9/10035.6/100
Housing (desirability)76.6/10031.1/100
Crime rate19935.4 / 1k2435.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools5
Parks & reserves2
Public transport stops10
Walkability0.0/10040.0/100
Nearby amenities04
Population3182,305
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/105/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Mullingar is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, and Piccadilly is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe. Mullingar sits more remote from the capital, whereas Piccadilly is further into the wider countryside.

Mullingar tends to lead on housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Piccadilly stands out for a quieter safety profile and walkability.

Choose Mullingar if you are weighing investors and value-focused buyers; lean toward Piccadilly for retirees and families.

Related comparisons

Mullingar vs Piccadilly, WA suburb comparison | Suburb Guide