Overall score
Mullingar
29.9/100
Piccadilly
35.6/100
Mullingar for investment and value; Piccadilly for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Mullingar
29.9/100
Piccadilly
35.6/100
Crime rate
Mullingar
19935.4 / 1k
Piccadilly
2435.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Mullingar
0
Piccadilly
4
Population
Mullingar
318
Piccadilly
2,305
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Mullingar | Piccadilly |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 29.9/100 | 35.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.6/100 | 31.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 19935.4 / 1k | 2435.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 5 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 2 |
| Public transport stops | — | 10 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 40.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 4 |
| Population | 318 | 2,305 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 5/10 |
Put side by side, Mullingar is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, and Piccadilly is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe. Mullingar sits more remote from the capital, whereas Piccadilly is further into the wider countryside.
Mullingar tends to lead on housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Piccadilly stands out for a quieter safety profile and walkability.
Choose Mullingar if you are weighing investors and value-focused buyers; lean toward Piccadilly for retirees and families.