Lancaster vs Tongala, VIC Suburb Comparison

Lancaster for families; Tongala for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

LancasterTongala

Overall score

Lancaster

41.7/100

Tongala

37.9/100

Crime rate

Lancaster

30.8 / 1k

Tongala

84.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Lancaster

3

Tongala

58

Population

Lancaster

398

Tongala

1,973

Metric leadLancaster 5Tongala 52 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryLancasterTongala
Overall score41.7/10037.9/100
Housing (desirability)49.6/10063.2/100
Crime rate30.8 / 1k84.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools12
Weather (desirability)18.6/10018.6/100
Public transport stops42
Walkability6.0/10049.0/100
Nearby amenities358
Planning activity829
Green cover0.0%0.0%
Population3981,973
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/102/10

Comparison summary

Lancaster reads as a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace; Tongala is a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace.

Lancaster tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and a calmer planning outlook, while Tongala stands out for housing affordability, schools and education options, and walkability. On housing, Lancaster sits in a well priced band, compared with a affordable feel in Tongala.

Lancaster suits retirees more clearly, whereas Tongala is the stronger match for investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons