Lancaster vs Tongala, VIC suburb comparison

Lancaster for retirees; Tongala for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

LancasterTongala

Overall score

Lancaster

36.8/100

Tongala

50.2/100

Crime rate

Lancaster

25.6 / 1k

Tongala

59.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Lancaster

3

Tongala

57

Population

Lancaster

398

Tongala

1,973

Metric leadLancaster 4Tongala 6across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryLancasterTongala
Overall score36.8/10050.2/100
Housing (desirability)68.9/10083.2/100
Crime rate25.6 / 1k59.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools12
Public transport stops42
Walkability6.0/10049.0/100
Nearby amenities357
Planning activity829
Population3981,973
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/102/10

Comparison summary

Lancaster reads as a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace; Tongala is a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace.

Lancaster tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and public transport access, while Tongala stands out for housing affordability and schools and education options. On housing, Lancaster sits in a well priced band, compared with a affordable feel in Tongala.

Lancaster suits retirees more clearly, whereas Tongala is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.

Related comparisons