Overall score
Lancaster
41.7/100
Tongala
37.9/100
Lancaster for families; Tongala for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Lancaster
41.7/100
Tongala
37.9/100
Crime rate
Lancaster
30.8 / 1k
Tongala
84.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Lancaster
3
Tongala
58
Population
Lancaster
398
Tongala
1,973
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Lancaster | Tongala |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 41.7/100 | 37.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 49.6/100 | 63.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 30.8 / 1k | 84.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 2 |
| Weather (desirability) | 18.6/100 | 18.6/100 |
| Public transport stops | 4 | 2 |
| Walkability | 6.0/100 | 49.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 3 | 58 |
| Planning activity | 8 | 29 |
| Green cover | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Population | 398 | 1,973 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 2/10 |
Lancaster reads as a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace; Tongala is a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace.
Lancaster tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and a calmer planning outlook, while Tongala stands out for housing affordability, schools and education options, and walkability. On housing, Lancaster sits in a well priced band, compared with a affordable feel in Tongala.
Lancaster suits retirees more clearly, whereas Tongala is the stronger match for investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.