Lancaster vs Wyuna, VIC suburb comparison

Lancaster for investment and value; Wyuna for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

LancasterWyuna

Overall score

Lancaster

36.8/100

Wyuna

29.9/100

Crime rate

Lancaster

25.6 / 1k

Wyuna

29.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Lancaster

3

Wyuna

0

Population

Lancaster

398

Wyuna

278

Metric leadLancaster 6Wyuna 2across 8 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryLancasterWyuna
Overall score36.8/10029.9/100
Housing (desirability)68.9/10027.5/100
Crime rate25.6 / 1k29.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools1
Public transport stops4
Walkability6.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities30
Planning activity85
Population398278
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/107/10

Comparison summary

Lancaster is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace, while Wyuna is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.

Lancaster pulls ahead on housing affordability and walkability, whereas Wyuna is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook.

Investors and value-focused buyers may find Lancaster the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Wyuna.

Related comparisons