Learmonth vs Mitchell Park, VIC Suburb Comparison

Learmonth for retirees and families; Mitchell Park for value and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

LearmonthMitchell Park

Overall score

Learmonth

54.9/100

Mitchell Park

39.8/100

Crime rate

Learmonth

20.4 / 1k

Mitchell Park

208.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Learmonth

6

Mitchell Park

6

Population

Learmonth

396

Mitchell Park

887

Metric leadLearmonth 4Mitchell Park 53 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryLearmonthMitchell Park
Overall score54.9/10039.8/100
Housing (desirability)58.2/10065.4/100
Crime rate20.4 / 1k208.9 / 1k
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves22
Public transport stops24
Walkability3.0/1006.0/100
Nearby amenities66
Planning activity2015
Green cover3.3%0.9%
Population396887
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/102/10

Comparison summary

Learmonth is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace, while Mitchell Park is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.

Learmonth tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Mitchell Park stands out for housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability. Learmonth generally means more mid-market housing value, while Mitchell Park leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Retirees and families may find Learmonth the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Mitchell Park.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons

Learmonth vs Mitchell Park, VIC Suburb… | Suburb Guide