Lewiston vs Mallala, SA Suburb Comparison

Lewiston for retirees and families; Mallala for investment and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

LewistonMallala

Overall score

Lewiston

33.7/100

Mallala

30.0/100

Crime rate

Lewiston

16.5 / 1k

Mallala

39.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Lewiston

6

Mallala

4

Population

Lewiston

3,275

Mallala

1,042

Metric leadLewiston 7Mallala 3across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryLewistonMallala
Overall score33.7/10030.0/100
Housing (desirability)54.5/10055.5/100
Crime rate16.5 / 1k39.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools—2
Weather (desirability)56.4/10015.5/100
Public transport stops—2
Walkability0.0/1003.0/100
Nearby amenities64
Planning activity9938
Green cover0.9%0.1%
Population3,2751,042
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/102/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Lewiston is a more rural mid-sized suburb that rewards people who want room to breathe, and Mallala is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace. Lewiston sits within day-trip reach of the capital, whereas Mallala is more regionally self-contained.

On the data, Lewiston is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and nearby cafés and amenities; Mallala answers with walkability and a calmer planning outlook. Lewiston generally means more sought-after housing, while Mallala leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Lewiston suits retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Mallala is the stronger match for households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons