Overall score
Lindisfarne
61.1/100
Otago
36.6/100
Lindisfarne vs Otago, TAS suburb comparison
Lindisfarne for families and value; Otago for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
LindisfarneOtago
Crime rate
Lindisfarne
541.2 / 1k
Otago
5684.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Lindisfarne
135
Otago
18
Population
Lindisfarne
6,639
Otago
596
Metric leadLindisfarne 6Otago 21 tiedacross 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesOtago
- Best for familiesLindisfarne
- Best for investmentOtago
- Best for best valueLindisfarne
- Best for best schoolsLindisfarne
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Lindisfarne | Otago |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 61.1/100 | 36.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 45.6/100 | 48.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 541.2 / 1k | 5684.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | — |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 4 |
| Public transport stops | 43 | 12 |
| Walkability | 86.0/100 | 18.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 135 | 18 |
| Population | 6,639 | 596 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 9/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Lindisfarne is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Otago is a settled metro smaller community that balances access with everyday calm.
Lindisfarne pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and public transport access, whereas Otago is the better pick for housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage.
Lindisfarne suits families and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Otago is the stronger match for retirees and investors.