Overall score
Lindisfarne
56.9/100
Otago
33.9/100
Lindisfarne vs Otago, TAS Suburb Comparison
Lindisfarne for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
LindisfarneOtago
Crime rate
Lindisfarne
55.5 / 1k
Otago
55.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Lindisfarne
140
Otago
21
Population
Lindisfarne
6,639
Otago
596
Metric leadLindisfarne 7Otago 13 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesLindisfarne
- Best for familiesLindisfarne
- Best for investmentLindisfarne
- Best for best valueLindisfarne
- Best for best schoolsLindisfarne
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Lindisfarne | Otago |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 56.9/100 | 33.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 59.2/100 | 46.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 55.5 / 1k | 55.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | — |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 4 |
| Public transport stops | 43 | 12 |
| Walkability | 86.0/100 | 18.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 140 | 21 |
| Green cover | 8.6% | 0.0% |
| Population | 6,639 | 596 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 9/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Lindisfarne is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Otago is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm.
Lindisfarne pulls ahead on public transport access, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Otago is the better pick for housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage.
Lindisfarne suits families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Otago is the stronger match for retirees and investors.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.