Lockyer vs McKail, WA suburb comparison

Lockyer for families and investment; McKail for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

LockyerMcKail

Overall score

Lockyer

39.7/100

McKail

38.2/100

Crime rate

Lockyer

2539.9 / 1k

McKail

830.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Lockyer

2

McKail

2

Population

Lockyer

1,298

McKail

3,970

Metric leadLockyer 4McKail 31 tiedacross 8 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryLockyerMcKail
Overall score39.7/10038.2/100
Housing (desirability)91.7/10065.9/100
Crime rate2539.9 / 1k830.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools6
Public transport stops84
Walkability12.0/1006.0/100
Nearby amenities22
Population1,2983,970
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/103/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Lockyer is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds, and McKail is a slower-paced mid-sized suburb with open surrounds.

Lockyer pulls ahead on housing affordability and public transport access, whereas McKail is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and a larger local community.

Families and investors may find Lockyer the better fit, while retirees are more likely to prefer McKail.

Related comparisons