McKail vs Orana, WA Suburb Comparison

McKail for families; Orana for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

McKailOrana

Overall score

McKail

33.3/100

Orana

43.7/100

Crime rate

McKail

50.0 / 1k

Orana

50.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

McKail

10

Orana

36

Population

McKail

3,970

Orana

2,035

Metric leadMcKail 2Orana 62 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMcKailOrana
Overall score33.3/10043.7/100
Housing (desirability)48.2/10067.8/100
Crime rate50.0 / 1k50.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools—6
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Public transport stops49
Walkability6.0/10046.5/100
Nearby amenities1036
Green cover1.3%1.6%
Population3,9702,035
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/101/10

Comparison summary

McKail is a slower-paced mid-sized suburb with open surrounds, while Orana is a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace.

McKail tends to lead on a larger local community and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Orana stands out for housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability.

Choose McKail if you are weighing retirees; lean toward Orana for families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons