McKail vs Orana, WA suburb comparison

McKail for retirees; Orana for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

McKailOrana

Overall score

McKail

38.2/100

Orana

43.4/100

Crime rate

McKail

830.5 / 1k

Orana

1619.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

McKail

2

Orana

25

Population

McKail

3,970

Orana

2,035

Metric leadMcKail 3Orana 5across 8 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMcKailOrana
Overall score38.2/10043.4/100
Housing (desirability)65.9/10066.7/100
Crime rate830.5 / 1k1619.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools6
Public transport stops49
Walkability6.0/10042.5/100
Nearby amenities225
Population3,9702,035
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/101/10

Comparison summary

McKail is a slower-paced mid-sized suburb with open surrounds, while Orana is a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace.

McKail tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and a larger local community, while Orana stands out for housing affordability and public transport access.

On balance, retirees are more likely to prefer McKail, while Orana remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons