Mango Hill vs North Lakes, QLD Suburb Comparison

Mango Hill for families and beach lifestyle; North Lakes for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Mango HillNorth Lakes

Overall score

Mango Hill

51.5/100

North Lakes

50.6/100

Crime rate

Mango Hill

57.9 / 1k

North Lakes

57.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Mango Hill

303

North Lakes

453

Population

Mango Hill

14,921

North Lakes

23,030

Metric leadMango Hill 5North Lakes 43 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMango HillNorth Lakes
Overall score51.5/10050.6/100
Housing (desirability)49.2/10050.8/100
Crime rate57.9 / 1k57.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools43
Weather (desirability)31.2/10031.2/100
Parks & reserves97
Public transport stops2947
Walkability88.0/10084.0/100
Nearby amenities303453
Green cover4.0%1.6%
Population14,92123,030
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/108/10

Comparison summary

Mango Hill reads as a coastal established suburb shaped by beach life and outdoor living; North Lakes is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Where Mango Hill is shaped by the coast, North Lakes offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.

On the data, Mango Hill is stronger for housing affordability, schools and education options, and parks and reserves; North Lakes answers with public transport access, nearby cafés and amenities, and a larger local community.

On balance, families, people chasing a beach lifestyle, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Mango Hill, while North Lakes remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons