Overall score
Mannum
31.6/100
Tungkillo
30.8/100
Mannum vs Tungkillo, SA Suburb Comparison
Mannum for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
MannumTungkillo
Crime rate
Mannum
42.4 / 1k
Tungkillo
24.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Mannum
2
Tungkillo
1
Population
Mannum
2,919
Tungkillo
342
Metric leadMannum 5Tungkillo 41 tiedacross 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Mannum | Tungkillo |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 31.6/100 | 30.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 54.9/100 | 55.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 42.4 / 1k | 24.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | — |
| Weather (desirability) | 37.3/100 | 37.3/100 |
| Public transport stops | 10 | — |
| Walkability | 15.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 2 | 1 |
| Planning activity | 130 | 14 |
| Green cover | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Population | 2,919 | 342 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 3/10 |
Comparison summary
Mannum is a more rural mid-sized suburb that rewards people who want room to breathe, while Tungkillo is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace. Mannum sits more regionally self-contained, whereas Tungkillo is within day-trip reach of the capital.
On the data, Mannum is stronger for walkability, nearby cafés and amenities, and tree cover and green space; Tungkillo answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and overall desirability. Mannum generally means more approachable housing costs, while Tungkillo leans toward more sought-after housing.
Households prioritising schools may find Mannum the better fit, while retirees and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Tungkillo.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.