Marino vs Trott Park, SA suburb comparison

Marino for retirees and families; Trott Park for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

MarinoTrott Park

Overall score

Marino

54.6/100

Trott Park

56.8/100

Crime rate

Marino

16.6 / 1k

Trott Park

15.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Marino

92

Trott Park

71

Population

Marino

2,277

Trott Park

3,124

Metric leadMarino 2Trott Park 7across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMarinoTrott Park
Overall score54.6/10056.8/100
Housing (desirability)52.9/10060.8/100
Crime rate16.6 / 1k15.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools1
Parks & reserves1
Public transport stops916
Walkability15.5/10053.0/100
Nearby amenities9271
Planning activity2726
Population2,2773,124
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/106/10

Comparison summary

Marino is a coastal smaller community with an easy, sea-led rhythm, while Trott Park is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby. Marino leans into coastal living, while Trott Park feels more inland and suburban in character.

On the data, Marino is stronger for nearby cafés and amenities and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Trott Park answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

Retirees and families may find Marino the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Trott Park.

Related comparisons