Overall score
Marino
54.6/100
Trott Park
56.8/100
Marino for retirees and families; Trott Park for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Marino
54.6/100
Trott Park
56.8/100
Crime rate
Marino
16.6 / 1k
Trott Park
15.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Marino
92
Trott Park
71
Population
Marino
2,277
Trott Park
3,124
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Marino | Trott Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 54.6/100 | 56.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 52.9/100 | 60.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 16.6 / 1k | 15.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | — |
| Public transport stops | 9 | 16 |
| Walkability | 15.5/100 | 53.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 92 | 71 |
| Planning activity | 27 | 26 |
| Population | 2,277 | 3,124 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 6/10 |
Marino is a coastal smaller community with an easy, sea-led rhythm, while Trott Park is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby. Marino leans into coastal living, while Trott Park feels more inland and suburban in character.
On the data, Marino is stronger for nearby cafés and amenities and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Trott Park answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Retirees and families may find Marino the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Trott Park.