Overall score
Marino
53.3/100
Trott Park
50.0/100
Marino for families and beach lifestyle; Trott Park for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Marino
53.3/100
Trott Park
50.0/100
Crime rate
Marino
16.2 / 1k
Trott Park
13.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Marino
95
Trott Park
74
Population
Marino
2,277
Trott Park
3,124
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Marino | Trott Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 53.3/100 | 50.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 54.4/100 | 59.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 16.2 / 1k | 13.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 56.4/100 | 56.4/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | — |
| Public transport stops | 9 | 16 |
| Walkability | 15.5/100 | 53.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 95 | 74 |
| Planning activity | 32 | 29 |
| Green cover | 1.6% | 10.8% |
| Population | 2,277 | 3,124 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 6/10 |
Marino is a coastal smaller community with an easy, sea-led rhythm, while Trott Park is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby. Marino leans into coastal living, while Trott Park feels more inland and suburban in character.
On the data, Marino is stronger for nearby cafés and amenities, plus stronger socioeconomic advantage; Trott Park answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and public transport access.
Retirees, families, people chasing a beach lifestyle, and households prioritising schools may find Marino the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Trott Park.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.