Overall score
Marleston
43.6/100
Torrensville
56.3/100
Torrensville for investment and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Marleston
43.6/100
Torrensville
56.3/100
Crime rate
Marleston
55.9 / 1k
Torrensville
72.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Marleston
129
Torrensville
217
Population
Marleston
1,950
Torrensville
4,110
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Marleston | Torrensville |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 43.6/100 | 56.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 42.8/100 | 25.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 55.9 / 1k | 72.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 4 |
| Public transport stops | 13 | 20 |
| Walkability | 40.5/100 | 84.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 129 | 217 |
| Planning activity | 31 | 58 |
| Population | 1,950 | 4,110 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 7/10 |
Marleston is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby, while Torrensville is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.
Marleston pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Torrensville is the better pick for schools and education options and public transport access. On housing, Marleston sits in a well priced band, compared with a expensive feel in Torrensville.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Torrensville, while Marleston remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.