Maroochydore vs Pacific Paradise, QLD Suburb Comparison

Maroochydore for retirees and families; Pacific Paradise for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

MaroochydorePacific Paradise

Overall score

Maroochydore

51.0/100

Pacific Paradise

45.9/100

Crime rate

Maroochydore

122.2 / 1k

Pacific Paradise

50.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Maroochydore

566

Pacific Paradise

22

Population

Maroochydore

20,629

Pacific Paradise

2,675

Metric leadMaroochydore 9Pacific Paradise 21 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMaroochydorePacific Paradise
Overall score51.0/10045.9/100
Housing (desirability)63.9/10071.8/100
Crime rate122.2 / 1k50.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools41
Weather (desirability)31.2/10031.2/100
Parks & reserves632
Public transport stops596
Walkability100.0/10011.0/100
Nearby amenities56622
Green cover7.7%7.0%
Population20,6292,675
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/103/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Maroochydore is a coastal established suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm, and Pacific Paradise is a sought-after metro mid-sized suburb where housing reflects strong local demand. Where Maroochydore is shaped by the coast, Pacific Paradise offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.

Maroochydore tends to lead on schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access, while Pacific Paradise stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

Retirees, families, people chasing a beach lifestyle, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools may find Maroochydore the better fit, while investors are more likely to prefer Pacific Paradise.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons