Mawson Lakes vs Parafield Gardens, SA suburb comparison

Mawson Lakes for retirees; Parafield Gardens for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Mawson LakesParafield Gardens

Overall score

Mawson Lakes

61.6/100

Parafield Gardens

64.7/100

Crime rate

Mawson Lakes

60.1 / 1k

Parafield Gardens

47.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Mawson Lakes

560

Parafield Gardens

164

Population

Mawson Lakes

13,794

Parafield Gardens

18,467

Metric leadMawson Lakes 4Parafield Gardens 6across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMawson LakesParafield Gardens
Overall score61.6/10064.7/100
Housing (desirability)45.8/10074.0/100
Crime rate60.1 / 1k47.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools29
Public transport stops6173
Walkability85.0/10076.0/100
Nearby amenities560164
Planning activity45148
Population13,79418,467
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/101/10

Comparison summary

Mawson Lakes is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Parafield Gardens is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Mawson Lakes pulls ahead on walkability and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Parafield Gardens is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Mawson Lakes generally means more sought-after housing, while Parafield Gardens leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Retirees may find Mawson Lakes the better fit, while families and investors are more likely to prefer Parafield Gardens.

Related comparisons