Overall score
Mawson Lakes
61.6/100
Parafield Gardens
64.7/100
Mawson Lakes for retirees; Parafield Gardens for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Mawson Lakes
61.6/100
Parafield Gardens
64.7/100
Crime rate
Mawson Lakes
60.1 / 1k
Parafield Gardens
47.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Mawson Lakes
560
Parafield Gardens
164
Population
Mawson Lakes
13,794
Parafield Gardens
18,467
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Mawson Lakes | Parafield Gardens |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 61.6/100 | 64.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 45.8/100 | 74.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 60.1 / 1k | 47.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 9 |
| Public transport stops | 61 | 73 |
| Walkability | 85.0/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 560 | 164 |
| Planning activity | 45 | 148 |
| Population | 13,794 | 18,467 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 1/10 |
Mawson Lakes is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Parafield Gardens is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.
Mawson Lakes pulls ahead on walkability and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Parafield Gardens is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Mawson Lakes generally means more sought-after housing, while Parafield Gardens leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Retirees may find Mawson Lakes the better fit, while families and investors are more likely to prefer Parafield Gardens.